Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(vet): Run rules against a managed database #2751

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 22, 2023
Merged

Conversation

kyleconroy
Copy link
Collaborator

The newest vet feature is running rules against databases hosted by us. You don't need to have PostgreSQL running locally, we'll take care of everything for you. This feature will be included in the next release as a private beta. We're still working out kinks in our infrastructure.

version: '2'
cloud:
  project: "01HAQMMECEYQYKFJN8MP16QC41"
sql:
- schema: postgresql/schema.sql
  queries: postgresql/query.sql
  engine: postgresql
  database:
    managed: true
  rules:
  - sqlc/db-prepare

@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ func Do(args []string, stdin io.Reader, stdout io.Writer, stderr io.Writer) int
rootCmd.PersistentFlags().StringP("file", "f", "", "specify an alternate config file (default: sqlc.yaml)")
rootCmd.PersistentFlags().BoolP("experimental", "x", false, "DEPRECATED: enable experimental features (default: false)")
rootCmd.PersistentFlags().Bool("no-remote", false, "disable remote execution (default: false)")
rootCmd.PersistentFlags().Bool("remote", false, "enable remote execution (default: false)")
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now that vet is also using the project configuration, we can't default to remote generation. Instead, allow users to opt in with the --remote flag.

@kyleconroy kyleconroy merged commit 232d6f9 into main Sep 22, 2023
7 checks passed
@kyleconroy kyleconroy deleted the kyle/managed-vet branch September 22, 2023 21:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants